We Are Calculator logoWe Are Calculator

Chicago vs Oklahoma City Cost of Living Comparison — Salary, Rent & Expenses

Oklahoma City is 12.7% cheaper than Chicago

To keep the same standard of living as $100,000 in Chicago, you'd need about $87,300 in Oklahoma City — a $12,700 saving per year.

Chicago, IL
103.6
Price level (100 = US avg)
$5,297/mo
Sample monthly budget
Oklahoma City, OK
90.4
Price level (100 = US avg)
$4,579/mo
Sample monthly budget

Monthly Cost Breakdown

Estimated monthly spending for a middle-income household, adjusted by each metro's BEA price level.

Housing (rent/mortgage)
−$499/mo
Chicago
$2,236
Oklahoma City
$1,737
Groceries
−$36/mo
Chicago
$510
Oklahoma City
$474
Transportation
−$66/mo
Chicago
$918
Oklahoma City
$852
Healthcare
−$35/mo
Chicago
$490
Oklahoma City
$455
Utilities
−$32/mo
Chicago
$439
Oklahoma City
$407
Other (apparel, entertainment)
−$50/mo
Chicago
$704
Oklahoma City
$654
Total / month
Chicago
$5,297
Oklahoma City
$4,579
Difference
−$718

Equivalent Salary: Chicago → Oklahoma City

The salary you'd need in Oklahoma City to maintain the same purchasing power as each income level in Chicago, using the BEA price ratio of 0.873.

Salary in ChicagoEquivalent in Oklahoma CityDifference
$50,000$43,600−$6,400
$75,000$65,400−$9,600
$100,000$87,300−$12,700
$150,000$130,900−$19,100
$200,000$174,500−$25,500

Chicago vs Oklahoma City: What the Numbers Mean

Moving from Chicago, IL to Oklahoma City, OK means your everyday costs are cheaper by roughly 12.7%. The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis measures Chicago's overall price level at 103.6 and Oklahoma City's at 90.4, where 100 represents the national average. In practical terms, a household spending $5,297 per month in Chicago would spend about $4,579 for the equivalent lifestyle in Oklahoma City — a swing of $718 every month, or $8,616 per year.

Housing is the decisive factor. Estimated monthly housing runs $2,236 in Chicago against $1,737 in Oklahoma City. Because rent and mortgage costs vary far more between metros than groceries or utilities, the housing line alone accounts for most of the 12.7% gap.

For salary negotiation or a remote-work relocation, the key number is the equivalent salary. A $100,000 income in Chicago has the same purchasing power as $87,300 in Oklahoma City. Looked at the other way, $100,000 in Oklahoma City is worth about $114,600 in Chicago terms. Use the Cost of Living Calculator to plug in your own expenses.

Cost of living compares prices across places at one point in time. The related question — how prices in one place have changed over time — is answered by inflation. To see what an income or price from an earlier decade is worth in today's money, see what old money is worth today, which converts any amount from 1913 onward using Consumer Price Index data.

Don't forget state taxes

Price levels don't include income tax, which can significantly swing your real take-home pay — especially between IL and OK.

Related Comparisons

More City Cost of Living Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Oklahoma City more expensive than Chicago?

Oklahoma City is 12.7% cheaper than Chicago overall. Based on the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities (2024), Chicago has a price level of 103.6 versus 90.4 for Oklahoma City, where 100 equals the national average.

What salary do I need in Oklahoma City to match $100,000 in Chicago?

To maintain the same purchasing power as a $100,000 salary in Chicago, you would need about $87,300 in Oklahoma City — a difference of $12,700 per year.

Which costs more, housing in Chicago or Oklahoma City?

Estimated monthly housing runs about $2,236 in Chicago versus $1,737 in Oklahoma City. Housing is the single biggest driver of the cost-of-living gap between the two metros.

Sources & methodology

Price levels use the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities for metropolitan areas (2024, released February 2026). Chicago maps to the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN MSA; Oklahoma City maps to the Oklahoma City, OK MSA. Category spending baselines come from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey. Category-level figures are modeled estimates and are illustrative; actual costs vary by household. This is a planning tool, not financial advice.